西外留学培训——专注于西安托福培训,西安雅思培训
您当前的位置: 雅思课程 > 雅思备考 > 如何攻克雅思写作高分干货

如何攻克雅思写作高分干货

时间:2019-07-17 16:55:24 | 编辑:西外留学服务中心 | 来自:西外留学服务中心

在英语考试的众多项目中

不知道各位烤鸭最怵的是哪一项?


反正考生最讨厌的就是写作了

眼看着时间一点点过去

笔下还是写不出来一个单词


说好的模板、说好的套路

到了考场上就大脑一片空白

更别提什么逻辑、论证了



然而

分数永远是学生的命根

要想提高雅思写作成绩

就得从根本上提升写作能力


下面雅思写作高分小妙招~

速来get



观点



“观点”就是在审题的过程中搞清楚这是一道什么样的题型。读完题之后你要做的第一件事情就是形成自己的观点。 有的题目是agree/disagree,有的题目设置为双边讨论,给出两格对立观点,让你去discuss一下,然后给出自己的观点。你要知道观点。   


这一步骤所对应的评分标准要求是:首先你需要有一个a clear position,一个清楚明确的立场。根据你的立场你还要有一个fully developed position,一个展开充分的观点。所以想观点的时候评分标准中的这两项记清楚。  

 


分段


第二件事—分段。将文章在你的观点的前提下分成几个段落,确定每个段落的核心内容和主体。 分段的要求在评分细则里是怎样体现的呢?7分以上文章对于分段有这样一句评论“skillfully manages  paragraphing”,指能熟练掌握分段的写作手法。 

  

这个熟练指的是分段方式不那么机械死板。拿到一篇文章,在同样的观点下你是否能想出多种合理的分段方法,而此基础上你是否能选取一个让人感觉耳目一新,十分巧妙的分段方式。   



大家都要关注的另外一个对于分段的要求是“分段充分求合理”,也就是说一定要在写作过程中杜绝分段不充分的现象。   


分段不充分就是把过多的观点和内容挤压在一个段落中进行表达。在四或五个段落中来表达你的思想是足够的,要保证一个段落只有一个核心思想。 

  


逻辑


第三件我们要做的事情是“逻辑”。英语是一个逻辑非常严密的语言,所以句与句之间,段与段之间的衔接就非常重要。   


段落之间的逻辑建立在合理分段的基础上,你要思考你的分段逻辑,随后想办法让段与段之间的衔接与过度变得更加自然。  

 




随后你要考虑的是句与句之间的衔接,评分标准关于这一项的要求是使用 “a wide rang of cohesive devices”,cohesive devices包括两句话之间的代词指代关系、定语从句或者连词等等。   


你要做到段与段,句与句之间都能做到逻辑畅通,衔接严丝合缝。   



语言


完成前三件事之后,你会发现你的脑海中已经构思出了一个完整结构的中文版本的文章,或者一个基础用词的英文构架已经搭建起来。   


接来下的事情就是组织和润色语言。这里要注意在使用语言的时候有两个值得关注的地方。 评分标准关于词汇语法层面的要求是 “a wide rang of vocabulary and structures”,要有大量的不同的词汇用法和各种各样的结构。   



同时要运用一些less common items, 不常见的词汇、表达或者是搭配。另外一个要关注的是要把词汇和语法做到accurately和flexibly,就是你能够比较准确地同时又比较灵活地去使用词汇和语法。表达不要过于生硬或者机械,要让考官看到你对于语言的驾驭能力。当然这里面也可以出现一些小的错误,即使是在8,9分的范文里面也会有minor errors,一些微小的错误。它们被作为slips出现,就是不经意间的小的笔误。   


只要这些错误比较少见,在词汇语法这一项你同样能拿到高分。


雅思8分作文讨论



It has long been argued amid the community: Which one counts more, authority or academy? Notwithstanding the fact that our current pedagogy is so much clinging to the central committee, the educational system is in a blockbuster amount of outcry for reform. Does the temporary system still embrace rationality? Or is it the ripe juncture to refurnish it out and out? I personally took a deep look in it.


  In the showdown between authority and academy, the former arguably outweighs the latter. Politics is a compulsory course in all kinds of enrollment examinations as well as all levels of educational institutions. The government, or a commander-in-chief to be vivid, needs to be held accountable for the stability of society. Education is by all means an almighty tool to incubate a behaving generation. With social development gaining momentum, a farsighted power base generally with a broader scope than the individuals, needs to build up particular majors specializing in fledgling domains involving cleaning energy, high-tech innovation, interpretation, to name but a few. Trained personnel in such fields are usually more fit into the society.


Arguments being articulated above though, academy-oriented teaching methodology is so far still reputed for its own merits. With teachers gaining more says in selecting knowledge, the students will presumably be inculcated with a more objective perception of the curriculum. Without authority barging in, the possibility of the impartiality being jeopardized is excluded for the mission of serving the regime is no longer valid. Only under such circumstance can the intrinsic value of the subject be authentically and manifested to the thirsty learners in an untangled manner. An untarnished and pristine academic ambience is colossally demanding by numerous pundits for the sake of equity and truth.


To sum up, there's no such inception that is appropriate to be dubbed "sheerly right" or "starkly wrong" . The righteous one solely lies in the rationality of adapting it. Authority, in China's case, can never be an outlier standing by the side of academic circle owing to its unique national condition.


请填写您的需求,我们会尽快与您联系!